Editing Talk:LL(k) ---- LL(1) Parsers
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | http:// | + | No, I'm not particularly sporty <a href=" http://www.pensionfreedom.ie/mobile-payday-loans#kidney ">3000 loan bad credit</a> The CED, in MizruchiÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs telling, thought the days of untrammeled free-market capitalism were gone, and that both private and government-led economic management would be necessary for a market economy to survive. In order to maintain the system from which their privileges derived, they believed it would be necessary to attend to the welfare of the broader population. This meant supporting a high level of employment, the alleviation of poverty, the amelioration of racial disadvantage, and the provision of sufficient purchasing power in the population to consume the goods that American business was so proficient at producing. |
+ | <a href=" http://www.alliedassetfinance.co.uk/loans-ma/#folded ">cts financing</a> Oh, and dividends should be taxed as any other income. Once you do away with a corporate rate there’s no longer any justification for halfing the tax between the corporation and the individual. Instead of 15% 20% the individual should pay the entire tax rate 35%. Add the penalty for forcible disgorgement and it’s up to 50%. Note: I’m not dealing with exemptions in this discussion. |