Editing Team
Warning: You are not logged in.
Your IP address will be recorded in this page's edit history.The edit can be undone.
Please check the comparison below to verify that this is what you want to do, and then save the changes below to finish undoing the edit.
Latest revision | Your text | ||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Hold the line, please <a href=" http://caribbean-airlines.com/index.php/kamagra-oral-jelly-kaufen-paypal#visits ">kamagrarx</a> One reason that he doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt pursue these contradictions in the behavior of ÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂthe new chief executive officerÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂàmay have to do with one of the core conceits of his book, and its biggest weakness. Mizruchi insists on framing the changed relationship between U.S. business and the state as one of the declining power of the corporate elite. This is a group, he writes, that has lost its unity, its efficacy, and even its ability ÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂto provide collective solutions to issues of concern to the business community.ÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂàHere, he is unconvincing. It is not at all clear that a business elite that has lost the ability to speak with one voice is necessarily less powerfulÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂit is just less united and less conscientious. |