Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lex"

Revision as of 21:04, 15 August 2014 (edit) 37.187.144.114 (Talk) (Could you please repeat that? http://www.mulotpetitjean.fr/htmlsite_fr/ ofloxacin tinidazole Her arguments were similar to the holding of the lower court, which said that individuals who want a schoo) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 20:21, 28 January 2017 (edit) (undo) 46.161.9.8 (Talk) (WZxGEpIZpuo)
(1,610 intermediate revisions by more than 100 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	Could you please repeat that? http://www.mulotpetitjean.fr/htmlsite_fr/ ofloxacin tinidazole Her arguments were similar to the holding of the lower court, which said that individuals who want a school to consider non-racial factors such as legacy status, geographic origin, and athletic skills, in its admission plan can lobby the popularly elected governing boards of the schools. But those black, Latino and other minority citizens who seek to restore the consideration of race as one factor in admissions are blocked from any lobbying by Proposal 2. Their only recourse is the incredibly difficult and expensive task of attempting to repeal the state constitutional amendment.	+

Latest revision as of 20:21, 28 January 2017