Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"

Latest revision as of 23:56, 14 October 2016

Revision as of 10:17, 17 November 2014 (edit) 62.210.142.7 (Talk) (I'd like to transfer some money to this account <a href=" http://www.cherihelms.com/online-portfolio/ ">graduated priligy cost yes</a> In fact, the Wellman-Wah paper finds no such thing: it’s n) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:56, 14 October 2016 (edit) (undo) 188.143.232.26 (Talk) (gtOy7c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com)
(6,565 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~I'd like to transfer some money to this account <a href="~~ http://www.~~cherihelms~~.com/online-portfolio/ ">graduated priligy cost yes</a> In fact, the Wellman-Wah paper finds no such thing: it’s not an empirical paper at all, and makes no attempt whatsoever to quantify investor profits, be they real or foregone. Instead, it’s an entirely theoretical thought experiment, where an “infinitely fast arbitrageur profits from market fragmentation” at the expense of “zero-intelligence trading agents”.	+	gtOy7c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com