Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"

Latest revision as of 23:56, 14 October 2016

Revision as of 19:15, 19 November 2014 (edit) 37.187.144.114 (Talk) (I like watching TV <a href=" http://www.hungarianbiotech.org/index.php/praziquantel-600-mg#probability ">order praziquantel online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – th) ← Older edit		Latest revision as of 23:56, 14 October 2016 (edit) (undo) 188.143.232.26 (Talk) (gtOy7c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com)
(6,299 intermediate revisions by 16 users not shown)
Line 1:		Line 1:
−	~~I like watching TV <a href="~~ http://www.hungarianbiotech.org/index.php/praziquantel-600-mg#probability ">order praziquantel online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time what the Framers meant when they wrote it – has triumphed on the court, in which case, it doesn't matter whether times have changed and the VRA is "outdated." If it was constitutional when adopted, it should still be constitutional today. In short, the VRA's invalidation by those who trumpet conservative values is really about just one thing: hypocrisy.	+	gtOy7c http://www.FyLitCl7Pf7kjQdDUOLQOuaxTXbj5iNG.com