|
|
| (3,152 intermediate revisions by 20 users not shown) |
| Line 1: |
Line 1: |
| − | Which university are you at? <a href=" http://www.3blackchicks.com/purchase-desyrel-online#braces ">trazodone 100mg</a> But he doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt pursue the truly unexpected and uncomfortable paradox his historical study reveals. When AmericaÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs postwar corporate elites were sexist, racist company men who prized conformity above originality and were intolerant of outsiders, they were also more willing to sacrifice their immediate gain for the greater good. The postwar America of declining income inequality and a corporate elite that put the communityÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂs interest above its own was also a closed-minded, restrictive world that the left rebelled againstÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂhence, the 1960s. It is unpleasant to consider the possibility that the personal liberation the left fought for also liberated corporate elites to become more selfish, ultimately to the detriment of us allÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂbut that may be part of what happened. The book sidles up to but doesnÃÂÃÂÃÂâÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂÃÂt confront head-on the vexing notion that as the business elite became more open and meritocratic, it also became more selfish and short-termist.
| + | Toowcduhn! That's a really cool way of putting it! |
Latest revision as of 14:50, 10 February 2017
Toowcduhn! That's a really cool way of putting it!
