Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"
(Please wait <a href=" http://www.xbrasil.net/wp/?tag=ace-checking-and-loans#document ">processing loans</a> "The availability of television and radio stations from our neighbouring island militates a) |
(What do you do for a living? <a href=" http://www.kade.ie/Code-of-Conduct-on-Images-Messages ">nizagara 150
</a> The great powers and Iran have now agreed upon a temporary nuclear deal, pending a mor) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | What do you do for a living? <a href=" http://www.kade.ie/Code-of-Conduct-on-Images-Messages ">nizagara 150 | |
| − | + | </a> The great powers and Iran have now agreed upon a temporary nuclear deal, pending a more permanent agreement in six months, which offers relief to Iran on crushing U.S.-European economic sanctions in exchange for which Iran has made modest concessions which may slightly slow their inevitable development of nuclear weapons. While the substance of the deal itself is being attacked by critics, it has other secondary problems: it sends the wrong messages to American adversaries and allies alike, it undermines the teetering alliance structure which has kept relative stability in the Middle East for 60 years, it alters the balance of regional power in the Middle East, and may unintentionally further accelerate the American departure from active leadership in the region. Diplomacy is not just about negotiating agreements, but on anticipating their consequences before they are made. If the White House thought through these consequences before they entered into this agreement with Iran, we have no evidence of it. | |
Revision as of 04:17, 8 November 2014
What do you do for a living? <a href=" http://www.kade.ie/Code-of-Conduct-on-Images-Messages ">nizagara 150 </a> The great powers and Iran have now agreed upon a temporary nuclear deal, pending a more permanent agreement in six months, which offers relief to Iran on crushing U.S.-European economic sanctions in exchange for which Iran has made modest concessions which may slightly slow their inevitable development of nuclear weapons. While the substance of the deal itself is being attacked by critics, it has other secondary problems: it sends the wrong messages to American adversaries and allies alike, it undermines the teetering alliance structure which has kept relative stability in the Middle East for 60 years, it alters the balance of regional power in the Middle East, and may unintentionally further accelerate the American departure from active leadership in the region. Diplomacy is not just about negotiating agreements, but on anticipating their consequences before they are made. If the White House thought through these consequences before they entered into this agreement with Iran, we have no evidence of it.
