Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"
From eplmediawiki
(Are you a student? <a href=" http://bikinginbarcelona.net/installment-loans-san-diego-ca/#petrol ">get a small loan today</a> Even if the Turkish federation escapes suspension and is free to send a t) |
(Get a job <a href=" http://ottawaconstructionnews.com/current-news/#elapse ">clomipramine 50mg</a> For years, conservatives have argued for a theory of constitutional interpretation called "originali) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | Get a job <a href=" http://ottawaconstructionnews.com/current-news/#elapse ">clomipramine 50mg</a> For years, conservatives have argued for a theory of constitutional interpretation called "originalism." Originalism asserts that a constitution must mean what its framers originally intended it to mean – at least until that constitution is formally changed through the required mechanism of amendment. Liberals, in contrast, tend to argue that a constitution must be a "living document" that changes and grows with the times. | |
| − | + | ||
Revision as of 12:17, 11 November 2014
Get a job <a href=" http://ottawaconstructionnews.com/current-news/#elapse ">clomipramine 50mg</a> For years, conservatives have argued for a theory of constitutional interpretation called "originalism." Originalism asserts that a constitution must mean what its framers originally intended it to mean – at least until that constitution is formally changed through the required mechanism of amendment. Liberals, in contrast, tend to argue that a constitution must be a "living document" that changes and grows with the times.
