Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"
From eplmediawiki
(Do you know what extension he's on? <a href=" http://caribbean-airlines.com/index.php/bactrim-and#tone ">bactrim for acne</a> One other thing we can be sure of: the Reconstruction amendments, in a re) |
(I'm on a course at the moment <a href=" http://www.groenservicebvba.be/zithromax-z-pak-order-online#bark ">buy zithromax online usa</a> The cameras are always rolling in Hollywood! When the stars are) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | Do you know what extension he's on? <a href=" http://caribbean-airlines.com/index.php/bactrim-and#tone ">bactrim for acne</a> One other thing we can be sure of: the Reconstruction amendments, in a relatively rare act of constitutional specificity, clearly and unequivocally gave Congress the authority to do whatever it felt necessary to carry out the amendments' aims. | + | Do you know what extension he's on? <a href=" http://caribbean-airlines.com/index.php/bactrim-and#tone ">bactrim for acne</a> One other thing we can be sure of: the Reconstruction amendments, in a relatively rare act of constitutional specificity, clearly and unequivocally gave Congress the authority to do whatever it felt necessary to carry out the amendments' aims. Normally, this type of "textual commitment" is precisely what conservatives look for to insist that the courts should keep hands off and let Congress have its way. |
Revision as of 23:45, 1 December 2014
Do you know what extension he's on? <a href=" http://caribbean-airlines.com/index.php/bactrim-and#tone ">bactrim for acne</a> One other thing we can be sure of: the Reconstruction amendments, in a relatively rare act of constitutional specificity, clearly and unequivocally gave Congress the authority to do whatever it felt necessary to carry out the amendments' aims. Normally, this type of "textual commitment" is precisely what conservatives look for to insist that the courts should keep hands off and let Congress have its way.
