Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

From eplmediawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Apple Will Hold Fall iPad Event on October 22)
(Dramatic changes to anti)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
@@@  
 
@@@  
Apple has a couple more new products to announce before the year is out, and it plans to unveil them in a few weeks time.
+
And this $600 million funding boost to national security agencies is very much about having enough resources and personnel to keep a watchful eye.
People familiar with Apple鈥檚 plans tell AllThingsD that the company will hold its next invitation-only event on Tuesday, October 22. The focal point of the gathering will be the latest updates to the company s iPad line, but the new Mac Pro and OS X Mavericks will likely get some stage time <a href=http://www.louisvuittontassenkopen.com>Louis Vuitton Tassen Kopen</a> as well, I m told.
+
But it s not merely a numbers game. The Australian government has a responsibility not to knowingly allow its citizens to wreak bloody havoc in the world.  
The fifth-generation iPad is expected to feature a thinner, lighter design akin to the iPad mini s, and an improved camera. It will run Apple鈥檚 new 64-bit A7 chip. The second-generation iPad mini will be upgraded with a retina display and also see the A7 incorporated into <a href=http://www.louisvuittontassenkopen.com>Louis Vuitton</a> its innards. It s not clear whether Apple s new iPads will feature the Touch ID fingerprint sensor that recently debuted on the iPhone 5s, though that has been rumored.
+
Advertisement
Sources declined to specify where the event is to be held, and I鈥檝e not been able to confirm a location. My understanding is that it will not be held at the California Theatre in San Jose, the site of the iPad mini s unveiling in 2012. That leaves Apple鈥檚 Town Hall Auditorium in Cupertino and the Yerba Buena Center for the Arts in San <a href=http://www.louisvuittontassenkopen.com>Geodkoop Louis Vuitton</a> Francisco as the two most likely locations.
+
With upwards of 150 Australians suspected of fighting in Syria and Iraq, there is also the threat posed should they return home.
Worth noting: The date of Apple s fall event coincides with both , and  in the United States.  
+
But again, this type of danger is not without precedent. The concern in years gone by was over Australians fighting in Afghanistan or Somalia. Similarly, the Brits had a serious challenge with radicalised young men with family ties to <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/louis-vuitton-artsy-gm-40>Louis Vuitton Artsy GM</a> Pakistan.  
  Reached for comment, Apple declined to give one.
+
As a result, Western security agencies have become pretty adept at monitoring borders and spotting the international links that are usually needed to draw people to the fight.  
Update: was first to report October 22 as the date of Apple s fall event.
+
What has changed in recent times - aside from the location of the conflicts - is the numbers of those involved, increasing the chance of someone with malevolent intent slipping by.
 +
That makes for an understandable case <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/damier-azur-toile-39>Damier Azur Toile</a> to increase the resources for security agencies.  
 +
But not a convincing argument for dramatic changes to the law, especially on the need to store massive amounts of personal data about Australians (an idea on the backburner, for now).
 +
The internet has long harboured a dark side of extremist propaganda. Without doubt, the sharing of graphic images on social media has increased the potential audience. But there is a big difference between idiots gawking at violence and actually planning an attack.
 +
Invoking the threat of lone wolf terrorists seems especially overblown. Terrorism is an act of political violence and while that does not preclude <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/louis-vuitton-alma-36>Louis Vuitton Alma</a> someone acting alone, a cell of like-minded conspirators is far more likely to encourage, plan and execute an attack.  
 +
The criminal code has proved well equipped to deal with individuals. &nbsp;
 +
  This is not to be ignorant of the huge moral challenge if security agencies believe extra powers can save lives.  
 +
  But the Abbott government must make a better case for new laws and be mindful of its conservative predecessor, to be alert and not alarmed.

Revision as of 14:58, 8 August 2014

@@@ And this $600 million funding boost to national security agencies is very much about having enough resources and personnel to keep a watchful eye.

But it s not merely a numbers game. The Australian government has a responsibility not to knowingly allow its citizens to wreak bloody havoc in the world. 
Advertisement 
With upwards of 150 Australians suspected of fighting in Syria and Iraq, there is also the threat posed should they return home. 
But again, this type of danger is not without precedent. The concern in years gone by was over Australians fighting in Afghanistan or Somalia. Similarly, the Brits had a serious challenge with radicalised young men with family ties to <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/louis-vuitton-artsy-gm-40>Louis Vuitton Artsy GM</a> Pakistan. 
As a result, Western security agencies have become pretty adept at monitoring borders and spotting the international links that are usually needed to draw people to the fight. 
What has changed in recent times - aside from the location of the conflicts - is the numbers of those involved, increasing the chance of someone with malevolent intent slipping by. 
That makes for an understandable case <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/damier-azur-toile-39>Damier Azur Toile</a> to increase the resources for security agencies. 
But not a convincing argument for dramatic changes to the law, especially on the need to store massive amounts of personal data about Australians (an idea on the backburner, for now). 
The internet has long harboured a dark side of extremist propaganda. Without doubt, the sharing of graphic images on social media has increased the potential audience. But there is a big difference between idiots gawking at violence and actually planning an attack. 
Invoking the threat of lone wolf terrorists seems especially overblown. Terrorism is an act of political violence and while that does not preclude <a href=http://www.saclouisvuittonhomme.com/louis-vuitton-alma-36>Louis Vuitton Alma</a> someone acting alone, a cell of like-minded conspirators is far more likely to encourage, plan and execute an attack. 
The criminal code has proved well equipped to deal with individuals.   
This is not to be ignorant of the huge moral challenge if security agencies believe extra powers can save lives. 
But the Abbott government must make a better case for new laws and be mindful of its conservative predecessor, to be alert and not alarmed.
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
extras
Toolbox