Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"
(Court- Lyrics shouldn't have been used as evidence) |
(Bill that would require smartphone kill switches is close to passage) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
@@@ | @@@ | ||
| − | + | The revised bill by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) passed the Senate and sailed through two Assembly committees. The full Assembly is expected to vote Thursday. | |
| − | + | The bill, if passed and signed by <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com>Yayoi Kusama Louis Vuitton Soldes</a> the governor, would make California the second state, after Minnesota, to require smartphone kill switches. | |
| − | + | Led by San Francisco Dist. Atty. George Gascon, the push for passage gained strength with a new report and survey by a Nebraska business professor. The analysis concluded that smartphone owners could save an estimated $3.4 billion a year if their handsets were rendered worthless by activation of a kill switch. | |
| − | + | "If all stolen phones could easily be disabled, criminals would have virtually no incentive to steal a phone in the first place," <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com/23-sac-porte-epaule>Sac port锟斤拷 锟斤拷paule</a> said William Duckworth of Creighton University in Omaha. He said that an online survey of smartphone owners showed overwhelming support for the kill-switch option. | |
| − | + | The Gascon-Leno proposal is supported by consumer groups, law enforcement and city governments including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Ana, Oakland and San Diego. | |
| − | + | It's opposed by the California and Los Angeles area chambers of commerce, tech groups and CTIA, a national wireless trade group. They contend that it's bad public policy for states to pass their own technical regulations for products sold nationally. | |
| − | + | CTIA's opposition is not shared by some of its members. According to Gascon, most smartphone makers and marketers, including Apple, , , Samsung, Blackberry, and AT&T, removed their earlier opposition to the bill. | |
| − | + | Phony papers | |
| − | + | Businesses should watch out for official-looking letters asking for $49.50 for a "Certificate of Status" to show <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com/24-sac-porte-main>Sac port锟斤拷 main</a> they are corporations in good standing, regulators warn. | |
| + | The documents are issued only by the Secretary of State, for a $5 fee. A Sacramento firm called "California State Corporations" is making the fraudulent solicitations and "has no affiliations" with the state government, according to an alert from the Secretary of State. Calls to the company, identified on the phone as "California Compliance," were not returned. | ||
| + | <br>Twitter: | ||
Revision as of 12:00, 27 August 2014
@@@
The revised bill by Sen. Mark Leno (D-San Francisco) passed the Senate and sailed through two Assembly committees. The full Assembly is expected to vote Thursday.
The bill, if passed and signed by <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com>Yayoi Kusama Louis Vuitton Soldes</a> the governor, would make California the second state, after Minnesota, to require smartphone kill switches.
Led by San Francisco Dist. Atty. George Gascon, the push for passage gained strength with a new report and survey by a Nebraska business professor. The analysis concluded that smartphone owners could save an estimated $3.4 billion a year if their handsets were rendered worthless by activation of a kill switch.
"If all stolen phones could easily be disabled, criminals would have virtually no incentive to steal a phone in the first place," <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com/23-sac-porte-epaule>Sac port锟斤拷 锟斤拷paule</a> said William Duckworth of Creighton University in Omaha. He said that an online survey of smartphone owners showed overwhelming support for the kill-switch option.
The Gascon-Leno proposal is supported by consumer groups, law enforcement and city governments including Los Angeles, San Francisco, Santa Ana, Oakland and San Diego.
It's opposed by the California and Los Angeles area chambers of commerce, tech groups and CTIA, a national wireless trade group. They contend that it's bad public policy for states to pass their own technical regulations for products sold nationally.
CTIA's opposition is not shared by some of its members. According to Gascon, most smartphone makers and marketers, including Apple, , , Samsung, Blackberry, and AT&T, removed their earlier opposition to the bill.
Phony papers
Businesses should watch out for official-looking letters asking for $49.50 for a "Certificate of Status" to show <a href=http://www.louisvuitton-pascher.com/24-sac-porte-main>Sac port锟斤拷 main</a> they are corporations in good standing, regulators warn.
The documents are issued only by the Secretary of State, for a $5 fee. A Sacramento firm called "California State Corporations" is making the fraudulent solicitations and "has no affiliations" with the state government, according to an alert from the Secretary of State. Calls to the company, identified on the phone as "California Compliance," were not returned.
Twitter:
