Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

Revision as of 10:07, 11 September 2014

@@@ President Barack Obama <a href=http://www.alportico.net/prodotti/christianlouboutin-sale.jkmsw.php>Christian Louboutin Heels</a> on Wednesday promised to take the fight to the terrorist organization that beheaded two American journalists and degrade and destroy it. Yet Obama has not approved U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State forces in Syria and remains opposed to the redeployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq (although he has ordered airstrikes in that country and has increased the number of troops guarding U.S. facilities there).Is there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds? Not if you read the fine print of what he has been saying about Islamic State. For example, in a news conference last week Obama said the organization poses an immediate threat to the people of Iraq and to people throughout the region. But he went on to outline a broader, comprehensive strategy that included regional partnerships and efforts to press Iraq to form an inclusive government that would reach out to disaffected Sunnis who have embraced Islamic State. And while he acknowledged that the Pentagon was preparing a range of options presumably including airstrikes in Syria Obama indicated that he was still weighing which, if any, to embrace.Given the gravity of direct U.S. involvement in Syria s many-sided civil war, such careful deliberation is responsible. Unfortunately, Obama expressed himself inartfully, saying, We don t have a strategy yet. He was actually referring to specific tactical decisions that lie in the future, but <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/images/guccioutlet.onlinesalecc.php>Gucci Outlet</a> it sounded as if he hadn t given any thought to the threat posed by Islamic State. The soundbite was a gift to his critics.But if the line about lacking a strategy created one misimpression, Obama s comments Wednesday in response to the beheading of freelance reporter Steven Sotloff could foster another: that the U.S. is about to wage total war on the organization.The beheadings of Sotloff and fellow journalist James Foley were barbaric acts that have rightly made wanted men of the perpetrators. But there is a difference between avenging their deaths or using air power to rescue trapped refugees, as the U.S. did last month and undertaking a military <a href=http://www.alportico.net/prodotti/christianlouboutin-sale.jkmsw.php>Christian Louboutin Pumps</a> operation to degrade and destroy a group that might be neutralized without such a commitment.Obama outlined a broader, comprehensive strategy' on Syria that included regional partnershipsIs there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds on Syria? Not really.

Los Angeles Times

Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

Revision as of 10:07, 11 September 2014

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

extras

Toolbox

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
 @@@
-ARNOLD聽 鈥?聽 The Fox School Board on Tuesday changed course and voted against hiring a board member's daughter as a <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/images/gucciusaonlineoutlet.php> cheap gucci</a>  special-education teacher's aide.The board had voted Aug. 19聽to hire聽Sophia Hermann to the $9.87-an-hour position at Simpson Elementary School. She was to work 6.5 hours a day for an annual salary of $11,286 with partial benefits. Her mother is Cheryl Hermann, the Fox district's longest-serving board member.Board member Dan Kroupa said Tuesday he was upset no one informed the board of the relationship and that he didn't know a board member's relative was being considered when voting on a group of hires.聽"We're under more scrutiny, and rightfully so," Kroupa said.聽The district has come under fire since nasty comments posted on a Topix website about district critics were traced to the home of Dianne Critchlow, the district's former superintendent, and her husband, and to other administrators as part of a libel lawsuit.Critchlow, 48, agreed in June to retire but denied she had made the comments. Her husband, who headed an at-risk program, was fired and other administrators were reprimanded.She retired with a $267,468 salary, among the highest in the state, which angered many at a time when the district is trimming millions from its budget.The board voted 4-1 Tuesday not to hire Sophia Hermann. Her mother abstained, Vern Sullivan was absent and David Palmer voted in favor of the hire, <a href=http://www.museosangennaro.com/Public/wdluk.php>Louboutin Shoes UK</a>  saying he couldn't vote against hiring someone who was the best candidate for the job.聽Todd Scott, assistant superintendent for human resources, said Tuesday that Sophia Hermann was among the top applicants for the job due to her experience working with severely autistic children. He apologized for not telling the board that she was related to a board member.Board President John Laughlin said no district policies were broken in hiring Sophia Hermann, and that an anti-nepotism policy adopted in June of last year required a committee be formed before the relative of a board member or superintendent or assistant superintendent is hired for a management position.Cheryl Hermann abstained from voting on her daughter's hire last month. She tried to speak at the Tuesday meeting, but Laughlin said she was not allowed to because of her family tie to the discussion.After the meeting, she said she thought the board knew Sophia Hermann was her daughter. She also said it's "very sad" that a highly qualified person <a href=http://www.avanttravel.com/michaelkorssonline.php> michael kors handbags</a>  won't be working with kids.The anti-nepotism policy enacted last year allows board members to hire relatives for nonsupervisory positions, such as teachers, custodians, nurses, coaches and secretaries.The board had come under fire for hiring Kelly Nash, who was an assistant manager at a McDonald鈥檚 restaurant and is the daughter-in-law of then-board president Linda Nash, as food services director for $65,000 a year, even though she had only a high school diploma and lacks the certifications and education required by other districts. She started her job in December 2012.Laughlin said it's likely the board will re-visit its anti-nepotism policy soon to tighten it further.
+President Barack Obama <a href=http://www.alportico.net/prodotti/christianlouboutin-sale.jkmsw.php>Christian Louboutin Heels</a>  on Wednesday promised to take the fight to the terrorist organization that beheaded two American journalists and degrade and destroy it. Yet Obama has not approved U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State forces in Syria and remains opposed to the redeployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq (although he has ordered airstrikes in that country and has increased the number of troops guarding U.S. facilities there).Is there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds? Not if you read the fine print of what he has been saying about Islamic State. For example, in a news conference last week Obama said the organization poses an immediate threat to the people of Iraq and to people throughout the region. But he went on to outline a broader, comprehensive strategy that included regional partnerships and efforts to press Iraq to form an inclusive government that would reach out to disaffected Sunnis who have embraced Islamic State. And while he acknowledged that the Pentagon was preparing a range of options presumably including airstrikes in Syria Obama indicated that he was still weighing which, if any, to embrace.Given the gravity of direct U.S. involvement in Syria s many-sided civil war, such careful deliberation is responsible. Unfortunately, Obama expressed himself inartfully, saying, We don t have a strategy yet. He was actually referring to specific tactical decisions that lie in the future, but <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/images/guccioutlet.onlinesalecc.php>Gucci Outlet</a>  it sounded as if he hadn t given any thought to the threat posed by Islamic State. The soundbite was a gift to his critics.But if the line about lacking a strategy created one misimpression, Obama s comments Wednesday in response to the beheading of freelance reporter Steven Sotloff could foster another: that the U.S. is about to wage total war on the organization.The beheadings of Sotloff and fellow journalist James Foley were barbaric acts that have rightly made wanted men of the perpetrators. But there is a difference between avenging their deaths or using air power to rescue trapped refugees, as the U.S. did last month and undertaking a military <a href=http://www.alportico.net/prodotti/christianlouboutin-sale.jkmsw.php>Christian Louboutin Pumps</a>  operation to degrade and destroy a group that might be neutralized without such a commitment.Obama outlined a broader, comprehensive strategy' on Syria that included regional partnershipsIs there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds on Syria? Not really.
+ Los Angeles Times