Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

From eplmediawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Will Romo bounce back- What the data says.)
(What Do Interviewers Really Look For-)
Line 1: Line 1:
 
@@@  
 
@@@  
−
A couple notes: the cut-off for a QBR drop that I considered significant was a drop of around 20 points. Some QBs barely missed the <a href=http://www.aec-ist.com/css/Gucci-Belts-Sale-Shorts-Ballet-Flats-Loafers.html>Gucci Belts Sale</a>  cut-offs (see Roethlisberger), but I decided to include them anyways. Also, Rodgers obviously didn't have a "bad" game week 1, but he did drop his QBR by ~30 points, so I decided to include him as well.
+
The first thing: Are you excited to work for this company? Whether you're an introvert or an extrovert, I need to feel and see that you are curious, knowledgeable, and, yes, excited about working for this company. Did you do some research about the company? Better yet, did you do some research and come with some well thought out questions about the company?
−
Let's Take a Closer Look.
+
 
−
The average change in yearly QBR for these QBs is -11.68
+
Interviewers really love this. It shows initiative, commitment, and engagement. Qualities this new employee will hopefully bring to all of her work projects. Also remember that even if I hire someone else for the current position, if you stand out for having the afore-mentioned qualities, I will probably remember <a href=http://www.symbiose.ca/images/christianlouboutin.gwij.php>Christian Louboutin Sale</a>  you when another opportunity comes up in the future.
−
This is actually the most disheartening statistic. What this really means is that Romo will probably have a significantly worse season this year, judging by his performance in the first game. None of the QBs who had a significant drop in their first game was able to even get close to their previous year's performance (at least in terms of QBR).
+
 
−
No QB had a drop as drastic as Romo did
+
The second thing: Body language. Yes, it's been talked about over and over, and there's a reason. It's important. Period. Eye contact, how you sit, your posture, how you shake hands, all of this matters. Maybe you're nervous? Say so. That can be an ice breaker. It shows your realness and can be the start of a dialogue about who you are. And speaking of who you are, brings us to ...
−
This kind of builds on the previous point, but Romo had a drop of -35.9 points. In our group of QBs only Rodgers gets close to that, and he was playing with a completely ridiculous 122.5 QBR the previous year. What this means is that the Romo we know and love could be a lot worse than we had hoped this year, maybe one of the worst years yet. This does not bode well for the team. However...
+
 
−
Out of all the teams with QBs that we able to stay above 80 QBR, only the  and  had a losing record
+
The third thing: How you tell your story. I'd love to have three hours to discuss what's been meaningful <a href=http://www.avanttravel.com/michaelkorssonline.php> michael kors outlet</a>  to you in your work history and personal life. Really, I would. Sadly, that is a rare luxury. You have a limited amount of time. It's in your best interest to maximize this time when we start to discuss your employment history and why you think you're the right person for the job. Some people have a hard time tooting their own horn, but toot you must.
−
Okay, now we're talking blue kool-aid. Yeah, yeah I know correlation, causation whatever, but the fact remains there's some knowledge to be gained here. This is actually the main reason why <a href=http://www.aec-ist.com/css/Gucci-Belts-Sale-Purse-Sale-Watch-Bands-Infant-Shoes.html>Infant Gucci Shoes</a>  I think the  might not be so bad this year. Looking at the teams that ended badly: Redskins are always a shaky team, especially in these past few years with RG3's knee and all. The Saints in 2012 had a horrible defense that gave up the most yards and second most points. I really doubt Romo's supporting cast this year could be as bad as those two teams. So there's still a little bit of hope for our Cowboys, especially since the 2013  won their division 12-4. Bad news is, none of the teams who had QBs below 80 QBR made it to playoffs.
+
 
−
Good QBs...stay good
+
Yes, there are people who go on and on about what they've done and it can be painful. Better <a href=http://www.symbiose.ca/images/christianlouboutin.gwij.php>Christian Louboutin Outlet</a>  approach is to spend some time not only thinking about your accomplishments but also a few of your character traits that make you the right person for the job. It's not bragging when you are genuine and speak from the heart. Trust me, it really comes through.
−
Again going off the previous point, all 3 of the "elite" (ugh) Quarterbacks who laid an egg their first game still managed a pretty good QBR at the end of the year. Brady, Brees, and Rodgers each were above 87 QBR that year, and also still created a situation for their team to at least have a shot at a winning record. (Though <a href=http://www.aec-ist.com/css/Cheap-Gucci-Sale-Keychain-Money-Clips-Envy-Perfume.html>Gucci Envy Perfume</a>  we already discussed why Brees's 2012 team did not make it) I chose to think Romo is closer to Brees and Brady than he is to RGIII and Michael Vick, so there is reason to think Romo will bounce back better than expected.
+
−
Conclusion
+
−
Okay, so the prognosis isn't too great. Romo is all but certain to decline this year, and very few teams with a QB that has declined make it to playoffs. There is still a little bit of hope, as evidenced by both Rodgers and Brady, if Romo can at least maintain a respectable QBR and the defense maintains its performance from week 1, we could end up with a team that is at least vying for a wildcard spot. If not, however, we could be in for a pretty rough year.
+

Revision as of 09:02, 25 September 2014

@@@ The first thing: Are you excited to work for this company? Whether you're an introvert or an extrovert, I need to feel and see that you are curious, knowledgeable, and, yes, excited about working for this company. Did you do some research about the company? Better yet, did you do some research and come with some well thought out questions about the company?

Interviewers really love this. It shows initiative, commitment, and engagement. Qualities this new employee will hopefully bring to all of her work projects. Also remember that even if I hire someone else for the current position, if you stand out for having the afore-mentioned qualities, I will probably remember <a href=http://www.symbiose.ca/images/christianlouboutin.gwij.php>Christian Louboutin Sale</a> you when another opportunity comes up in the future.

The second thing: Body language. Yes, it's been talked about over and over, and there's a reason. It's important. Period. Eye contact, how you sit, your posture, how you shake hands, all of this matters. Maybe you're nervous? Say so. That can be an ice breaker. It shows your realness and can be the start of a dialogue about who you are. And speaking of who you are, brings us to ...

The third thing: How you tell your story. I'd love to have three hours to discuss what's been meaningful <a href=http://www.avanttravel.com/michaelkorssonline.php> michael kors outlet</a> to you in your work history and personal life. Really, I would. Sadly, that is a rare luxury. You have a limited amount of time. It's in your best interest to maximize this time when we start to discuss your employment history and why you think you're the right person for the job. Some people have a hard time tooting their own horn, but toot you must.

Yes, there are people who go on and on about what they've done and it can be painful. Better <a href=http://www.symbiose.ca/images/christianlouboutin.gwij.php>Christian Louboutin Outlet</a> approach is to spend some time not only thinking about your accomplishments but also a few of your character traits that make you the right person for the job. It's not bragging when you are genuine and speak from the heart. Trust me, it really comes through.

Retrieved from "http://eplmediawiki.di.uminho.pt/index.php?title=User:RahalMccall69&oldid=868610"
Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
extras
Toolbox