Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

Revision as of 06:45, 1 October 2014

@@@ President Barack Obama <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/clreplicashoes.php> Christian Louboutin Outlet Online</a> on Wednesday promised to take the fight to the terrorist organization that beheaded two American journalists and degrade and destroy it. Yet Obama has not approved U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State forces in Syria and remains opposed to the redeployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq (although he has ordered airstrikes in that country and has increased the number of troops guarding U.S. facilities there).Is there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds? Not if you read the fine print of what he has been saying about Islamic State. For example, in a news conference last week Obama said the organization poses an immediate threat to the people of Iraq and to people throughout the region. But he went on to outline a broader, comprehensive strategy that included regional partnerships and efforts to press Iraq to form an inclusive government that would reach out to disaffected Sunnis who have embraced Islamic State. And while he acknowledged that the Pentagon was preparing a range of options presumably including airstrikes in Syria Obama indicated that he was still weighing which, if any, to embrace.Given the gravity of direct U.S. involvement in Syria s many-sided civil war, such careful deliberation is responsible. Unfortunately, Obama expressed himself inartfully, saying, We don t have a strategy yet. He was actually referring to specific tactical decisions that lie in the future, but <a href=http://www.alportico.net/gosoc.php> true religion outlet</a> it sounded as if he hadn t given any thought to the threat posed by Islamic State. The soundbite was a gift to his critics.But if the line about lacking a strategy created one misimpression, Obama s comments Wednesday in response to the beheading of freelance reporter Steven Sotloff could foster another: that the U.S. is about to wage total war on the organization.The beheadings of Sotloff and fellow journalist James Foley were barbaric acts that have rightly made wanted men of the perpetrators. But there is a difference between avenging their deaths or using air power to rescue trapped refugees, as the U.S. did last month and undertaking a military <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/clreplicashoes.php> Christian Louboutin Outlet Online</a> operation to degrade and destroy a group that might be neutralized without such a commitment.Obama outlined a broader, comprehensive strategy' on Syria that included regional partnershipsIs there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds on Syria? Not really.

Los Angeles Times

Difference between revisions of "User:RahalMccall69"

Revision as of 06:45, 1 October 2014

Personal tools

Namespaces

Variants

Views

Actions

Search

Navigation

extras

Toolbox

@@ Line 1: / Line 1: @@
+@@@
-President Barack Obama said Sunday that he will outline to the nation on Wednesday his plans for fighting Islamic militants, but does does not expect to ask Congress for approval to act. I m preparing the country to make sure that we deal with a threat from ISIL, using another name for Islamic militant group, Obama said that aired Sunday on NBC s Meet the Press. Obama said he will meet with congressional leaders Tuesday and address the nation on Wednesday. There s going to be an economic <a href=http://www.radiorcs.com/page.php?sale=Kate-Spade-Jewerly>Kate Spade Jewerly</a>  element to this. There s going to be a political element to it. There s going to be a military element to it, he said. And what I want people to understand, though, is that over the course of months, we are going to be able to not just blunt the momentum of ISIL. We are going to systematically degrade their capabilities. We re going to shrink the territory that they control. And ultimately we re going to defeat em. Obama said the United States would be as part of an international coalition to offer assistance to the region, but repeated again that he would be sending ground troops to Iraq.Obama also defended his decision to delay executive action on immigration, saying the summer s surge of unaccompanied children at the Mexican border changed the politics <a href=http://www.radiorcs.com/page.php?sale=Kate-Spade-Bridal-Shoes>Kate Spade Bridal Shoes</a>  of the issue. He rejected criticism that the postponement is a political tactic intended to help embattled Democrats in the months before contentious midterm elections, saying that the delay will help make new immigration policies sustainable when they are announced later this year. I'm being honest now about the politics of it. This problem with unaccompanied children that we saw a couple weeks ago, where you had, from Central America, a surge of kids who were showing up at the border, got a lot of attention.  And you know, the truth of the matter is-- is that the politics did shift midsummer because of that problem. I want to spend some time, even as we're getting all our ducks in a row for the executive action, I also want to make sure that <a href=http://www.avanttravel.com/page.php?sale=Tory-Burch-Alice-Mini-Bag>Tory Burch Alice Mini Bag</a>  the public understands why we're doing this, why it's the right thing for the American people, why it's the right thing for the American economy.
+President Barack Obama <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/clreplicashoes.php> Christian Louboutin Outlet Online</a>  on Wednesday promised to take the fight to the terrorist organization that beheaded two American journalists and degrade and destroy it. Yet Obama has not approved U.S. airstrikes against Islamic State forces in Syria and remains opposed to the redeployment of U.S. combat troops in Iraq (although he has ordered airstrikes in that country and has increased the number of troops guarding U.S. facilities there).Is there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds? Not if you read the fine print of what he has been saying about Islamic State. For example, in a news conference last week Obama said the organization poses an immediate threat to the people of Iraq and to people throughout the region. But he went on to outline a broader, comprehensive strategy that included regional partnerships and efforts to press Iraq to form an inclusive government that would reach out to disaffected Sunnis who have embraced Islamic State. And while he acknowledged that the Pentagon was preparing a range of options presumably including airstrikes in Syria Obama indicated that he was still weighing which, if any, to embrace.Given the gravity of direct U.S. involvement in Syria s many-sided civil war, such careful deliberation is responsible. Unfortunately, Obama expressed himself inartfully, saying, We don t have a strategy yet. He was actually referring to specific tactical decisions that lie in the future, but <a href=http://www.alportico.net/gosoc.php> true religion outlet</a>  it sounded as if he hadn t given any thought to the threat posed by Islamic State. The soundbite was a gift to his critics.But if the line about lacking a strategy created one misimpression, Obama s comments Wednesday in response to the beheading of freelance reporter Steven Sotloff could foster another: that the U.S. is about to wage total war on the organization.The beheadings of Sotloff and fellow journalist James Foley were barbaric acts that have rightly made wanted men of the perpetrators. But there is a difference between avenging their deaths or using air power to rescue trapped refugees, as the U.S. did last month and undertaking a military <a href=http://capstone.edu.sg/clreplicashoes.php> Christian Louboutin Outlet Online</a>  operation to degrade and destroy a group that might be neutralized without such a commitment.Obama outlined a broader, comprehensive strategy' on Syria that included regional partnershipsIs there a mismatch between the president s words and deeds on Syria? Not really.
+ Los Angeles Times