Difference between revisions of "Talk:LL(k) ---- LL(1) Parsers"

From eplmediawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Could I take your name and number, please? <a href=" http://www.shanemcdonald.com/about/#climbing ">buy nizagara australia</a> Monday night the Senate will vote on a "border surge" amendment that wou)
(Could I order a new chequebook, please? <a href=" http://ziplinegear.biz/finding-a-ghostwriter/ ">meantime help with homework assignments coat</a> But there remains the nuclear weapon: section 40 of)
Line 1: Line 1:
Could I take your name and number, please? <a href=" http://www.shanemcdonald.com/about/#climbing ">buy nizagara australia</a>  Monday night the Senate will vote on a "border surge" amendment that would add 700 new miles of border fence, 20,000 new border security agents and increase the use of drones and technology to secure the southern border between the U.S. and Mexico.
+
Could I order a new chequebook, please? <a href=" http://ziplinegear.biz/finding-a-ghostwriter/ ">meantime help with homework assignments coat</a>  But there remains the nuclear weapon: section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, proud baby of Hacked Off&rsquo;s chairman Hugh Tomlinson QC and already on the statute books, which provides for savage financial penalties against any newspaper that is ever sued, unless it has joined a royal charter-recognised regulator. The penalties apply whether the newspaper wins or loses the case, which is the civil equivalent of saying that you will always go to jail, whatever the jury decides. Section 40 may, in the end, be ruled unconstitutional, but it will be a brave newspaper that volunteers to be the guinea pig.

Revision as of 09:58, 3 November 2014

Could I order a new chequebook, please? <a href=" http://ziplinegear.biz/finding-a-ghostwriter/ ">meantime help with homework assignments coat</a> But there remains the nuclear weapon: section 40 of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, proud baby of Hacked Off’s chairman Hugh Tomlinson QC and already on the statute books, which provides for savage financial penalties against any newspaper that is ever sued, unless it has joined a royal charter-recognised regulator. The penalties apply whether the newspaper wins or loses the case, which is the civil equivalent of saying that you will always go to jail, whatever the jury decides. Section 40 may, in the end, be ruled unconstitutional, but it will be a brave newspaper that volunteers to be the guinea pig.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
extras
Toolbox