Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"
From eplmediawiki
(good material thanks <a href=" http://www.ambassadordivers.com/lansoprazole-uk.html ">prevacid 24hr</a> Students attend classes at the Ephatha Primary school July 18, 2012 in Juba, South Sudan. South) |
(I like watching TV <a href=" http://www.hungarianbiotech.org/index.php/praziquantel-600-mg#probability ">order praziquantel online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – th) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | I like watching TV <a href=" http://www.hungarianbiotech.org/index.php/praziquantel-600-mg#probability ">order praziquantel online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time what the Framers meant when they wrote it – has triumphed on the court, in which case, it doesn't matter whether times have changed and the VRA is "outdated." If it was constitutional when adopted, it should still be constitutional today. In short, the VRA's invalidation by those who trumpet conservative values is really about just one thing: hypocrisy. | |
Revision as of 19:15, 19 November 2014
I like watching TV <a href=" http://www.hungarianbiotech.org/index.php/praziquantel-600-mg#probability ">order praziquantel online</a> The conservative vision of an unchanging Constitution – that means for all time what the Framers meant when they wrote it – has triumphed on the court, in which case, it doesn't matter whether times have changed and the VRA is "outdated." If it was constitutional when adopted, it should still be constitutional today. In short, the VRA's invalidation by those who trumpet conservative values is really about just one thing: hypocrisy.
