Difference between revisions of "Team"
From eplmediawiki
(I'm doing a masters in law <a href=" http://dokumentarci.com/topvideos.html#turner ">free prevacid coupons</a> The neurosurgeon who admitted and diagnosed Mora, however, denies he gave her a month to) |
(I'd like to cancel a cheque <a href=" http://www.verenigingmolenvrienden.nl/het-molenmuseum.html#way ">cleocin t acne</a> Williams, 64, was the 500th person named to the FBI's "Ten Most Wanted" list) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | About a year <a href=" http://www.west10entertainment.com/index.php?page=CASES#drill ">home pharmacy australia and bimatoprost</a> Now, if you believe in "original intent" and an unchanging Constitution, the only question you need ask about Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act's targeting of jurisdictions with a history of discrimination against blacks – such as, say, the Confederacy – still today is: Have they changed any relevant section of the Constitution since 1965? | + | About a year <a href=" http://www.west10entertainment.com/index.php?page=CASES#drill ">home pharmacy australia and bimatoprost</a> Now, if you believe in "original intent" and an unchanging Constitution, the only question you need ask about Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act's targeting of jurisdictions with a history of discrimination against blacks – such as, say, the Confederacy – still today is: Have they changed any relevant section of the Constitution since 1965?ÃÂÃÂ And the answer is: No. |
Revision as of 00:15, 22 November 2014
About a year <a href=" http://www.west10entertainment.com/index.php?page=CASES#drill ">home pharmacy australia and bimatoprost</a> Now, if you believe in "original intent" and an unchanging Constitution, the only question you need ask about Section 5 of the Voting Rights Act's targeting of jurisdictions with a history of discrimination against blacks – such as, say, the Confederacy – still today is: Have they changed any relevant section of the Constitution since 1965?ÃÂÃÂ And the answer is: No.
