Difference between revisions of "Category talk:Utilities"
(What sort of music do you like? http://eastcountyins.com/about-us/ buy zithromax online no prescription In her decision, Bransten said it was premature at this stage of the case to accept that Morgan) |
(Will I have to work shifts? <a href=" http://www.thisistimeads.com/index.php/cv/ ">10mg paxil</a> Regulation can always be improved, and reporting on regulatory failures, real or alleged, is obviousl) |
||
Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
− | + | Will I have to work shifts? <a href=" http://www.thisistimeads.com/index.php/cv/ ">10mg paxil</a> Regulation can always be improved, and reporting on regulatory failures, real or alleged, is obviously in the public interest. But when these are reported in the immediate aftermath of disaster, thereâs a pretty clear implication of causation, and an equally clear responsibility to back it up, if not with actual evidence then at least with a coherent argument. At the very least, there is a responsibility to consider the alternative, that the one had nothing to do with the other. Hand-waving references to federal regulation âcoming under fresh scrutinyâ in the wake of the disaster are the journalistic equivalent of Mulcairâs âexact linkâ disclaimer. |
Revision as of 03:08, 17 August 2014
Will I have to work shifts? <a href=" http://www.thisistimeads.com/index.php/cv/ ">10mg paxil</a> Regulation can always be improved, and reporting on regulatory failures, real or alleged, is obviously in the public interest. But when these are reported in the immediate aftermath of disaster, thereâs a pretty clear implication of causation, and an equally clear responsibility to back it up, if not with actual evidence then at least with a coherent argument. At the very least, there is a responsibility to consider the alternative, that the one had nothing to do with the other. Hand-waving references to federal regulation âcoming under fresh scrutinyâ in the wake of the disaster are the journalistic equivalent of Mulcairâs âexact linkâ disclaimer.