Difference between revisions of "LR vs. LL Parsers"

From eplmediawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Created page with "An LL parser is much easier to understand than an LALR parser, easier to write and debug and it has better error recovery semantics. A lot of non-LL grammars can be easily mun...")
 
(sddNEt <a href="http://qllbuantpjsh.com/">qllbuantpjsh</a>, [url=http://ruwqnbrjokku.com/]ruwqnbrjokku[/url], [link=http://lwxyczkttcnb.com/]lwxyczkttcnb[/link], http://ignbnnpfgsau.com/)
 
(16 intermediate revisions by 10 users not shown)
Line 1: Line 1:
An LL parser is much easier to understand than an LALR parser, easier to write and debug and it has better error recovery semantics. A lot of non-LL grammars can be easily munged into LL(k)-form, in a lot of cases, where k=1. LL parser generators tend to produce smaller tables than LALR parsers.
+
sddNEt  <a href="http://qllbuantpjsh.com/">qllbuantpjsh</a>, [url=http://ruwqnbrjokku.com/]ruwqnbrjokku[/url], [link=http://lwxyczkttcnb.com/]lwxyczkttcnb[/link], http://ignbnnpfgsau.com/
 
+
[[Category:Basic Concepts]]
+

Latest revision as of 06:12, 7 April 2014

sddNEt <a href="http://qllbuantpjsh.com/">qllbuantpjsh</a>, [url=http://ruwqnbrjokku.com/]ruwqnbrjokku[/url], [link=http://lwxyczkttcnb.com/]lwxyczkttcnb[/link], http://ignbnnpfgsau.com/

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
extras
Toolbox