Difference between revisions of "StinsonMowry361"
(Other amount <a href=" http://www.aitvm.org/aitvm.org/index.php/generic-cipralex-escitalopram ">cipralex escitalopram oxalate 10mg</a> Other factors that might have contributed to the jump inAlcoa sh) |
(A jiffy bag http://www.fdt.ie/index.php/help-on-essay/ dissertation search While the reports provide devastating details and draw attention to the debate, stories of innocent people hurt in drone str) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | + | A jiffy bag http://www.fdt.ie/index.php/help-on-essay/ dissertation search While the reports provide devastating details and draw attention to the debate, stories of innocent people hurt in drone strikes “don’t add substantively to knowledge of the drone program nor do they alter the standard line about needing more transparency and access to medical help,” Joshua Foust, a commentator on U.S. counter-terrorism policy and former fellow at the American Security Project, told TIME in an email. Transparency in the drone program faces two main obstacles, Foust says: First, the drone politics of a country like Pakistan are messy, with the government quietly supporting the strikes (including feeding the U.S. intelligence), then publicly condemning them and whipping public opinion into a frenzy. | |
Revision as of 06:52, 8 December 2014
A jiffy bag http://www.fdt.ie/index.php/help-on-essay/ dissertation search While the reports provide devastating details and draw attention to the debate, stories of innocent people hurt in drone strikes “don’t add substantively to knowledge of the drone program nor do they alter the standard line about needing more transparency and access to medical help,” Joshua Foust, a commentator on U.S. counter-terrorism policy and former fellow at the American Security Project, told TIME in an email. Transparency in the drone program faces two main obstacles, Foust says: First, the drone politics of a country like Pakistan are messy, with the government quietly supporting the strikes (including feeding the U.S. intelligence), then publicly condemning them and whipping public opinion into a frenzy.
