Difference between revisions of "Talk:Lex"
From eplmediawiki
(avwDHRNNLZoBnwp) |
(Remove card <a href=" http://www.hikingservice.fi/en/ ">cheap ivermectin horse wormer</a> It is one of the best known theories because most people recognize how ridiculous it is. Â But, he intended i) |
||
| Line 1: | Line 1: | ||
| − | http:// | + | Remove card <a href=" http://www.hikingservice.fi/en/ ">cheap ivermectin horse wormer</a> It is one of the best known theories because most people recognize how ridiculous it is. Â But, he intended it to be ridiculous, to show how ridiculous the current theory on light was. Â Since the average person correctly recognizes the ridiculousness of the statement, anybody championing this theory as serious obviously has less of a scientific mind than the average person. Â Way to go, National Geographic. Â Maybe you should go back to reporting on soft science? |
Revision as of 19:17, 9 September 2014
Remove card <a href=" http://www.hikingservice.fi/en/ ">cheap ivermectin horse wormer</a> It is one of the best known theories because most people recognize how ridiculous it is. Â But, he intended it to be ridiculous, to show how ridiculous the current theory on light was. Â Since the average person correctly recognizes the ridiculousness of the statement, anybody championing this theory as serious obviously has less of a scientific mind than the average person. Â Way to go, National Geographic. Â Maybe you should go back to reporting on soft science?
