Difference between revisions of "Talk:Main Page"

From eplmediawiki
Jump to: navigation, search
(Excellent work, Nice Design http://www.oliver-sinz.de/accessoires/ assurans 20mg tab His comments came as the Office for National Statistics revealed that house prices in August were 3.8pc higher tha)
(Where are you calling from? <a href=" http://www.drijendesigns.co.uk/jual-penegra/#suit ">long term side effects of penegra</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any tim)
Line 1: Line 1:
Excellent work, Nice Design http://www.oliver-sinz.de/accessoires/ assurans 20mg tab His comments came as the Office for National Statistics revealed that house prices in August were 3.8pc higher than the previous year at £247,000 &ndash; topping the previous all-time high recorded in January 2008, just after the credit crunch struck.
+
Where are you calling from? <a href=" http://www.drijendesigns.co.uk/jual-penegra/#suit ">long term side effects of penegra</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any time tax rules are experienced by taxpayers as a substantial burden without generating substantial revenue for the government, improvement is possible. Having taxpayers be burdened less and pay more can make them better off and help the fisc. That is what should be done with corporate taxes. The U.S. should eliminate the distinction between repatriated and unrepatriated foreign corporate profits for U.S. companies and tax all foreign income (after allowance for taxes paid to other governments) at a fixed rate well below the current U.S. corporate rate &#8212; perhaps in the 15 percent range. A similar tax should be imposed on past accumulated profits held abroad.

Revision as of 17:45, 13 May 2015

Where are you calling from? <a href=" http://www.drijendesigns.co.uk/jual-penegra/#suit ">long term side effects of penegra</a> But this would not be the best outcome. As a very general rule, any time tax rules are experienced by taxpayers as a substantial burden without generating substantial revenue for the government, improvement is possible. Having taxpayers be burdened less and pay more can make them better off and help the fisc. That is what should be done with corporate taxes. The U.S. should eliminate the distinction between repatriated and unrepatriated foreign corporate profits for U.S. companies and tax all foreign income (after allowance for taxes paid to other governments) at a fixed rate well below the current U.S. corporate rate — perhaps in the 15 percent range. A similar tax should be imposed on past accumulated profits held abroad.

Personal tools
Namespaces

Variants
Actions
Navigation
extras
Toolbox