MamieOlin802

Then there is the most universal of all symbols, the Swastika (pictured). At 1 time it was believed that the Buddhists carried it all more than the globe with them, but it has been identified out that ages prior to Buddhism it was used amongst nations. In Old Babylon and in Egypt it was to be identified. What does this show? All these symbols could not have been purely standard.There have to be some purpose for them some organic association between them and the human thoughts. Language is not the result of convention it is not that individuals ever agreed to represent specific tips by particular words there in no way was an idea with out a corresponding word or a word with no a corresponding notion ideas and words are in their nature inseparable. The symbols to represent ideas could be sound symbols or colour symbols. Deaf and dumb individuals have to believe with other than sound symbols. Each believed in the thoughts has a kind as its counterpart. This is named in Sanskrit philosophy Nama - rupa -- name and type.

It is as not possible to create by convention a system of symbols as it is to create a language. In the world's ritualistic symbols we have an expression of the religious believed of humanity. It is easy to say that there is no use of rituals and temples and all such paraphernalia each child says that in modern instances. But it must be easy for all to see that these who worship inside a temple are in numerous respects different from these who will not worship there. Consequently the association of particular temples, rituals, and other concrete forms with particular religions has a tendency to bring into the minds of the followers of those religions the thoughts for which these concrete factors stand as symbols and it is not sensible to ignore rituals and symbology altogether. The study and practice of these things type naturally a component of Karma-Yoga.

To get much more information check out : cattle trailers