ShroyerFromm649

Most vegetarians who cease eating meat for ethical

reasons also take measures to steer clear of contributing to the

suffering and death of animals (and even insects) in other

capacities. For instance, a quantity of vegetarians refuse to

put on leather and silk due to the fact they see it as an ethical

violation of their respect for all living things.

Vegetarians who refuse to put on silk argue that the approach

involves unnecessary cruelty to moth larvae. Rather than

permitting the moth to develop and leave the cocoon, silk

manufacturers boil the larvae alive, causing them to endure

and writhe, in order to acquire longer strands of silk.

Leather, by contrast, does not straight contribute to the

suffering of animals in most circumstances. In most instances, leather

is produced from the byproducts of animals that would be

slaughtered for meat, rennet, and other animal

solutions.

This is precisely why most vegetarians who have an ethical

dilemma with meat have no trouble wearing leather: considering

they do not see it as the main purpose for killing the

animals, but instead a byproduct of the slaughter.

Still, certain groups of vegans oppose wearing leather

on the grounds that it indirectly contributes to the

suffering of animals.

These vegans argue that contributing income to the businesses

that own the slaughterhouses (and sell the byproducts for

leather, and so on.) is just as negative as really getting and

eating meat your self simply because you are still contributing

income to the continuation of institutionalized animal

suffering.

This is surely something to think of if you are

presently a vegan or a vegetarian for ethical reasons.

It could have been difficult to give up meat in the initially spot,

but if you are really committed to the cause and you

think the arguments are robust-adequate, you might want

to prevent clothing purchases that will aid institutions

that cause animal suffering. african endangered animals